Sunday, July 27, 2008
Chrysostom Thirumeni
So much has been written about Chrysostom Thirumeni. Yet so much is to be written. There are simple things that speak a lot with a personal touch, which might have helped you to think and rethink; which might have changed your world view, ideology, theology or perception of yourself, your ministry. This blog intends to bring out such personal stories which would help others to think differently, creatively and critically. For example, when I was working in Allahabad Mar Thoma Parish, soon after my ordination in 1977, Chrysostom Thirumeni came to Allahabad with the intention of visiting the congregations in my charge, mainly, those at Obra, Renukoot and Singrauli. Few days spent with Thirumeni really altered many of my notions of ministry, theology and the world.
It was the time of annual Kumbh Mela in Allahabad. Millions of people were gathered there for a dip in the Triveni Sangam, meeting place of the holy rivers of Ganges, Yamuna and the Invisible Saraswathi, at Prayag. It never occurred to me that I should visit such a place. I am a Christian priest. What would others think about me if I go to a Hindu festival. In my younger days, once I went to some Hindu festivity very near to my house with a Hindu friend. My father was very upset about that, as he thought himself to be an evangelical Christian to whom a best way to witness Christ was to look down or avoid all non-Christian festivals. In my family we never celebrated Onam, the most important festival in Kerala. So when Thirumeni asked, I thought Thirumeni would appreciate my Christian commitment if I said no and confidently said that I do not intend to visit the festival. Of course, my Kolkatta days as a student in Bishop's Collge has given me some exposure to Kalighat and Sri Ramakrishna mission, and I even wrote a thesis on Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, the great Hindu philosopher. Yet my basic views have not been changed about non-Christian religions. It was also a fact that I wanted to spend my life as a missionary and visited many ashrams with that purpose and finally decided to join the Satna Ashram and requested the Church for permission. Even at that time of making a decision, Chrysotom Thirumeni visited the Kolkatta parish and then started asking me questions about what would I do in Satna. I told him that I would enter into dialogue with the Hindu Pundits and Thirumeni smiled at me but kept a meaningful silence. That silence haunted me several years later when I started reconsidering my decision and decided to leave the Satna ashram. Thirumeni might have seen the immaturity in my arrogant confidence about such heedless aspirations of becoming a missionary. Even if I have decided to go to Prayag, I would have gone to that holy bathing ghats, with Gospel tracts, which I used to do as student chaplain in Kochi before joining the Seminary. When Thirumeni asked me why don't I go with him to Prayag I haven't not got the slightest idea of what he would be doing. I was wondering what would happen If all the sanyasins see Thirumeni and Christians like me in white cassock .
I discovered that Thirumeni was fully enjoying the crowd at Kumbh Mela. He in his long brown cassock would visit each and every stall, say hello to sanyasins, buy something or other, browse through some holy books. Now after thirty years, after reading the remarkable volume on Thirumeni's thought, titled, Mission in the Market Place, edited by Jesudas Athyal and John J. Thatamannil, I have come to understand that Thirumeni considered mission as permeation of the fragrance of the Gospel rather than any act of arrogant display of the superiority of Christianity, in the name of uniqueness of Christ. From some puja pandal some swami offered us some prasadam (sweet goodies offered to idols of deities.) which Thirumeni respectfully received. Seeing me hesitant to receive them Thirumeni nodded as if to tell me that it would be all right if I take them. I obliged half heartedly. Then to my surprise Thirumeni started eating it. I was holding it in my hand so that I can throw it away when nobody would notice, the very same thing which I used to do when my Hindu friends in College used to bring Prasadam either from Sabarimala or any local temple. Thirumeni then asked why I am not eating it. It is very tasty he said. I thought it would not go down my throat as it was offered to some idol. Thirumeni told me: Don't you know that there is only one God and idols are only human creations. They have power over us only as much we concede. Then I started slowly swallowing the prasadam little by little. It was a turning point in my life. There came a stage when I realized that Thirumeni was right when I studied Paul's confrontation with Peter on account of eating with the gentile Christians. Even though Peter had the vision and mandate from the risen Jesus not to consider unholy what God has created holy, as it was difficult for Peter to get over the tradition of people, the same thing happened to me, holding me back from exercising the freedom of a Christian over against my conscience which was certainly shaped by the customs and manners of my community. Later in my life I had several opportunities to see the freedom of Christian in the life of Thirumeni, though I had some reservation in fully endorsing my statements because I see occasionally in Thirumeni some features which question my general opinion about his radical Christian faith, mainly the administrative decisions he took with regard to women's ordination or decision to defrock one of the achens whose book became controversial. Still I strongly hold that I have seen no other greater Christian leader than Chrysostom Thirumeni, perhaps with the possible exception of Dr. M. M. Thomas.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Dr. Jacob Thomas' observations on the uniqueness of Metropolitan Chrysostom's insights are most valuable and timely. As Achen notes, while much has been written on the Metropolitan, much more remains to be said. As a thinker who, in his own contextually relevant and rather unconventional ways, spelt out the vision of what the church in India and in the diaspora should be, the bishop is truly unparalleled. In his personal life, to a certain extend, he attempted to live out his vision (as the instance narrated by Achen at Allahabad proves). The question, however, remains as to how far he, during his long period as a church administration (one of the longest in history), succeeded in translating his vision into the agenda of the church.
What a tragedy!!
I am not surprised however. The apostasy had long ago taken place.
The denial of the uniqueness of Christ, the fallibility of the
scriptures and syncretism is taught in the main seminary and many old
the same ideas in the Mar Thoma church.
The church needs to go back to its beginning in the Kerala Reformation
within the Orthodox Church beginning.
A shepherd is not judged by the superiority of his ideas or lifestyle but by the health and well-being of the flock under his care.
The question is not whether the venerated Metropolitan is a great Christian or a great thinker. An ordinary Christian may be judged thus. But a bishop or an overseer is answerable to God for the spiritual state of the "flock" under his care.
What spiritual progress did the Mar Thomas Church make under the leadership of this Metropolitan during his very long tenure?
Please go through 1 Corinthians
8:8-13..Follow your 'God' or the 'Word of GOD'. Anyone else can be wrong.
MANY MANY HAPPY RETURNS OF THE DAY THIRUMENI.....LONG LIVE OUR THIRUMENI...:) GOD BE WITH YOU ALWAYS ....WHEREEVER YOU ARE...:)
Post a Comment